A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household household at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of planning breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Times posting about René Collier as well as Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design performs at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as a result parts are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, an image that has because become emblematic of your depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they have been meant to Assemble Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations described, describing how the two Males entered the drinking water in the course of extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm water to photograph the positioning grew to become The most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a region influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail through the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as readers sought to be aware of the track record and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial minute within the legal timeline.
On the core on the dispute is a disagreement in excess of boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as made, goes further than what was accredited and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of arranging files, maps, and disorders attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is motivated by concern for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal view, insisting rather that it's about making sure that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and Accountant Paul Feely ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they may have explained their very long-standing link to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few merely trying to build a family property in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Unique Region of Conservation and say that all works are actually carried out depending on Skilled tips and authorised programs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into the sea during a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute above development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for just a condition a large number of observers see as ever more typical. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had Earlier been involved with area advocacy on organizing and environmental troubles, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from quite distinctive Skilled backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-high water throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded through waistline-superior h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both equally the physical fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature of the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an too much method.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the end result stays unsure. The court have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with preparing authorization and whether or not any encroachment right into a Distinctive Location of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing disorders. Yet the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who ought to live together with one another extensive once the authorized fees are actually compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the situation extend outside of that tackle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the value of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. It also underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems like environmental protection and home rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre in the dispute stands partially developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized inquiries. No matter whether it'll in the end be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court’s findings. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probably continue to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Just about the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.